Privacy

4153 readers

294 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

danielintempesta@programming.dev

[Meta] Should we consolidate this community with !privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com ? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 1 year ago by Blaze@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@programming.dev

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

!privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com has

900 users / day
1.58K users / week
2.86K users / month

This community has

61 users / day
220 users / week
483 users / month

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GrapheneOS? Tor?

What are you talking about? In what sense do those services “use” cryptocurrency?

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They both accept crypto currency donations.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh. That's different. I get what you mean and I'm not even trying to weigh in on whether they should allow or disallow, but they also "use" the credit card system. That doesn't mean someone should imply that they are endorsing it.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would say they are endorsing it by using it, but lets not split hairs. Not being about to talk about a funding part of many privacy tools is too restrictive for a privacy community.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 4 points 1 year ago

I would say they are endorsing it by using it

I feel like I just raised a counterexample to this. Like, literally just, in the very short message you're responding to.

Not being about to talk about a funding part of many privacy tools

Again: Misleading. If you want to talk about crypto, fine. Be honest about what you want to do and why you think it's important.