this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
907 points (98.5% liked)

politics

31175 readers
2293 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old DOGE staffer recently promoted to a senior adviser role in the State Department, is reportedly the grandson of former KGB spy Valery Martynov.

Martynov was executed in the Soviet Union after being exposed as an FBI informant. Coristine, an alleged former cybercriminal, previously worked in the General Services Administration and now has potential access to sensitive diplomatic data.

Concerns have been raised over his background and apparent lack of a security check.

The situation fuels fears about foreign influence in U.S. government operations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What kind of North Korean "sins of the father" shit is this?

Punish him for his actions of helping Musk take over the government in a coup, not that his grandad did spycraft every nation did in the Cold War.

I don't care if he was the grandson of Jesus Christ and Buddha if he is a dipshit fascist. Fascists get called out for being fascists, not being related to one they might have never known.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (5 children)

National security isn't fair because its more important than being fair and those who are for any reasons suspect are free to do any of the other hundreds of millions of jobs.

People are absolutely suspect because of their associations.

[–] Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com 10 points 2 years ago

Exactly this. Top Secret clearance typically extends out to three degrees of separation. They’ll check on you, your friends/family, and their friends/family. Because when national security is concerned, they don’t want to risk a leak due to something like a cousin being a spy and going drinking after work with the employee.

[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

100%. This arsehole deserves it.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Then would a check to everyone of an immigrant family be acceptable? Only people who's family have never left the country are fit to protect it?

That feels like a violation of the 14th amendment, and ensures only redneck Republican hillbillies are the ones who ensure the safety of Americans.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Being a child of an immigrant isn't kinda depends on where from and whether we are at war with them

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So was the Japanese internment camps rational? We were at war with Japan so we forbid them from having anything else, as national born citizens who never once stepped foot in Japan.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's pretty clear that japanese internment camps were illegal and morally reprehensible. There is a vast difference between not allowing someone to take a tiny number of highly secure jobs with the government entirely legally and imprisoning people and herding them into a camp like animals contravening their rights and the law. It's not a slippery slope its standing on the edge of the grand canyon and jumping in.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"It's a matter of national security that your kind isn't allowed to work here."

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wherein your kind is literally ideologically AND the grandchild of our literal enemy as opposed to a certain skin color

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Slavic people are an ethnicity. Not one as "readable" as east asians or african americans, but they are.

Again, their actions define them as shitheads who enable Trump's bullshit, not some tainted DNA shit. If they were German or Japanese or Chinese that matters equally as much here. Someone isn't an enemy to America and the lives of our citizens because they are related to a Russian agency that hasn't existed in 30 years.

[–] daepicgamerbro69@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

oh no somebody think of all the POK (People of KGB)!! What are you smoking? Non-Americans have more often than not some ties to some foreign secret police? Your take sounds unironically more racist then whatever the fuck you're against.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"I don't think someone's family defines them, their actions do."

"YOU'RE THE RACIST HERE!"

[–] daepicgamerbro69@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

again point to the sentence where I claim the thing you are mad about

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’m not sure the people making the jingoistic comments are aware of the implications of this way of thinking.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Liberals want the same policies as Conservatives just with a different coat of paint.

Most of them probably couldn't hold any government office if the shoe was on the other foot.

"Family moved here from Ireland when the potato famine struck? Sorry no matter how much you love this country you're dead to us."

"Family was forced out of the country due to a genocide that still has lingering effects? Sucks to be you."

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

National security being more important than being fair has been justification to do many of the most horrific acts in recent history.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nonsense. Its normal for a small number of highly secure roles to go only to people whose loyalty is beyond and known doubt. This means if you have questonable family you can only be a CEO, scientist, dentist welder or race car driver or you know all the other jobs other than say head of the NSA or part of the team with access to all our secrets

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Advocating for nepotism on the basis of loyalty and national security is partly why we are in this mess. America has never been a meritocracy, and we should stop pretending it ever was.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's not nepotism. Nobody is suggesting hiring people based on their personal relationship to decision makers. It is about preferring those who don't have any ties that could be exploited including but not limited to family ties that could complicate loyalty.

We have this mess in America because we are a nation that on average worships wealth and hates intellectualism whilst allowing an insane amount of wealth to interfere with politics to the point where the country is arranged to enrich the wealthy at the expense of everyone else leading to widespread disaffection which has been turned by a poisoned media to hate and blame for the other. For people smarter than the mass of the average. For immigrants. For the poor in need of welfare.

We have hired a despot because he implies that we can bask in his reflected glory and help ourselves up on the backs of this other.

In short we aren't hear because we don't allow the grandchildren of enemy spies with our most secret data.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So, McCarthyism was necessary, for national security?

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Literally having someone argue that because he's related to a KGB agent, he's by default evil.

And when I said "Actions define someone as evil, not their family linage." they called me the real racist. 🙄

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Liberals project as much as conservatives.

[–] daepicgamerbro69@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What kind of "nuanced" concerntroll is this? No sane person would say shit if the kid was a political moderate but since he's a fascist swine AND alleged grandson of a secret police officer, 100% I am going to use it against him.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The kid would be a fascist swine dipshit if he was from Alabama and his family was from New York and his grandad was from Mississippi.

Actions are what make someone a fascist, not their family linage.

[–] daepicgamerbro69@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

point to the exact sentence where I said something akin to what you're so uptight about.