this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
832 points (98.3% liked)

DeclineIntoCensorship

877 readers
19 users here now

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ech@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I'm not saying this couldn't happen, but this justdoesn't ring super true to me. How would the user know who the "identified individual" was, how they found the husband's information, or who they called (the "friend") at his company that's apparently in control of his employment? That's a lot of convenient coincidences that, even of they are true, would hardly be easily accessible information to make such a confident accusation.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If the employer is an University or something like that in a smaller state, and they called specifically about a policy change or something happening at the department of education, it could be relatively easy to happen, especially if they gave their name when calling the representative (which I guess you would).

[–] lonerangers1@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

truepeoplesearch.com

give it a go. Try searching your name, number, address and see what you get.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It doesn't ring true because of the vagueness of the post.