this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
4 points (66.7% liked)

jet's interesting finds

80 readers
1 users here now

my journal

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

great conversation about cardiovascular risk

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m required to click in order to find out any of the measures since they’re not in the title of the video or in the post description. Before watching, I have no idea whether they’ll be snake oil.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Clickbait implies a misleading, or incorrect title.

If you want a written resource, I'm sure you can find one.

I've curated what I put in the interesting area to be things I found interesting of high value.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Okay, I was a bit harsh, and “clickbait” is inaccurate. I’m sorry.

Still seems like the measures could be revealed in the title or post description.

[–] butternuts@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

5:13 he gives the TL;DR - metabolic health. It wasn't even that far into the video my guy.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Proposed new video title:
“How metabolic health can be measured at home to Predict a Heart Attack - Dr. Brewer”

That would be sufficient to know if the video is worth a click.

[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

5 minute is a long time. The effort I am willing to put into listening is proportional to the amount of care the creator took when editing to respecting the listener's time.

If someone approaches me in a way that signals they obviously and blatantly do not value my time, why would I give them any of it?