this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
63 points (100.0% liked)
Australian Politics
1512 readers
137 users here now
A place to discuss Australia Politics.
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australia (general)
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Okay, so what we need to get these laws passed is the Unions to come up with false and misleading advertisements about Dutton, the Nationals, and Albanese, in the next week or two before this next election is called, and sit back and watch the amendments sail through with the full support of the opposition.
"If the Unions are doing it, it must be wrong!" Some Liberal staffer, probably.
I doubt they would need to enact truth in political advertising laws for that. Dutton and his colleagues have shown a willingness to flex defamation laws when people say things that make them feel sad. They are also privileged enough to be among the few who have the financial means to pursue those kinds of actions.
My guess is you'd end up with a bunch of strategically expensive defamation actions that are intended to tie up those sort of advertisements until after the election.
Now, if it was something that would stop the Greens or teals from building more support? Watch that fly through Parliament with bipartisan approval.
I think the Unions are still big enough to deal with the threat of frivolous defo suits. Or, more importantly, they're large enough that the wealthy have to think twice.