this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
668 points (99.7% liked)

World News

51300 readers
2940 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo revealed that the U.S. agreed to curb gun smuggling into Mexico—something omitted from Trump’s statement about their call.

While Trump announced that Mexico would send 10,000 troops to the U.S. border, he did not mention this key concession.

Studies show 68–90% of traced firearms in Mexico originate from or pass through the U.S.

The tariff pause follows Mexico's commitment to increased border security, but Sheinbaum’s disclosure highlights a significant aspect Trump did not publicly acknowledge.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Honestly, that’s not a bad deal. The US gets fentanyl enforcement. Mexico gets the flow of guns slowed, which weakens the cartels.

The tariff thing was a silly dance to get there, though. Makes me wonder if that wasn’t market manipulation. Knowing the tariffs would hit in the morning, then get lifted before enforcement would have made it very easy to play the market for a ton of money.

[–] badhops@sh.itjust.works 47 points 10 months ago

but... the Mexican government already had the troops on the border. Biden did that in 2021.. so nothing new there. Most Fentanyl is smuggled in my US citizens as they are not scrutinized as much as a Mexican citizen coming in legally or illegally. So again not much of a win.. seems like a tantrum that is planned to set him and his wealthy friends to swoop in

[–] jdnewmil@lemmy.ca 19 points 10 months ago

So optimistically assuming that Trump will follow through.

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Regarding fentanyl, trump did everything except actually address it. Why not impose sanctions on Chinese pharmaceutical companies? Improve regulations to allow tracking of fentanyl ingredients (which are legal), create a task force that would trace suppliers and help impose more sanctions.

[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

As is tradition, your mistake is in assuming he actually wants to help anyone

[–] miak@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Or they could have addressed both fentanyl in the US and the cartels in Mexico by just agreeing to end the war on drugs...

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 10 months ago

Except the US would giving up the current source of slave labor by stopping the war on drugs.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The US gets fentanyl enforcement

Nothing was stopping the US from producing fentanyl.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The (claimed) issue was fent coming over the border, not domestically produced fent.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Right, so nothing changed except Mexico has an excuse to boost troops deployments on our border.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They didn't need an excuse, more of their troops to the border was the ask.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yes, I know the more troops on the border was the ask of the Mexican president, which made Donold buckle like a belt.

Those troops are to keep Americans out... Not to keep anyone in.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Almost nothing of the US fentanyl gets in through Mexico...

[–] swampdownloader@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How do you figure? From my understanding China and other places make precursor ingredients which are then manufactured in the field in Latin America. Are you saying the vast majority is fentanyl manufactured in China and shipped directly to the US?

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

There has been lots of well published studies in the US last year. Well published enough to catch on the international press.

Most of their fentanyl seems to be smuggled out of their chemical and drug industries.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago

Your source?

Mexico and China are absolutely the source of pretty much all the illegal fent in the U.S.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Where do you get yours from.