this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
333 points (99.4% liked)

Selfhosted

60587 readers
1260 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think it's a good idea, everyone should be automating this anyway.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Valid certificate is anything you trust. Any CA which you can trust is no more or less secure than the one you get from LE, so for the private network you can just happily sign your own certificates and just distribute the CA to your devices.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But then you have to distribute CAs to all the devices that will reach this service, and not all devices allow that.

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True. And there's also a ton of devices around which don't trust LetsEncrypt either. There's always edge cases. For example, take a bit older photocopier and it's more than likely that it doesn't trust on anything on this planet anymore and there's no easy way to update CA lists even if the hardware itself is still perfectly functional.

That doesn't mean that your self-signed CA, in itself, would be technically any less secure than the most expensive Verisign certificate you can find. And yes, there's a ton of details and nuances here and there, but I'm not going to go trough every technical detail about how certificates work. I'm not an expert on that field by any stretch even if I do know a thing or two and there's plenty of material online to dig deep into the topic if you want to.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm good. I know very well there are uses cases for a self signed cert. LE is still far more practical for 99% of use cases, even internally.