this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
51 points (96.4% liked)

Selfhosted

61003 readers
397 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi all!

I have decided to setup and selfhost my own private Lemmy instance.

I will be doing with docker (podman, actually).

Should I host at home or use a dedicated VPS?

Anybody selfhosting its own Lemmy?

Do you guys have any hints for me?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you have less than 10 or so users, id say go ahead and self host. It's not terribly resource intensive at least not on my personal instance. I use it to test posts, solutions that will eventually make it's way into a pr, or just experiments and that can (and does) run on a pi.

[–] Shimitar@feddit.it 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Thanks! I have a more powerful hardware than a pi, how is it about bandwidth?

I will have two, maybe three users.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Very very little. It's a billion tiny little bits of text, and if you have image caching enabled, then all those thumbnails.

My personal instance doesn't cache images since I'm the only one using it (which means a cached image does nobody any good), and i use somewhere less than 20gb a month, though I don't have entirely specific numbers, just before-lemmy and after-lemmy aggregates.

[–] Shimitar@feddit.it 2 points 2 years ago
[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not too much. I don't have specific stats but there's not much video being shared. We are not at the level where it takes too much bandwidth.