“Summarize all the details of the article in the headline so that reading the article is unnecessary” is not an editorial standard held by any newspapers, to my knowledge.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Your use of quotation marks implies that you're quoting me. Please point to where I said, "Summarize all the details of the article in the headline so that reading the article is unnecessary”

Or perhaps you're acting in bad faith? I believe that may have been a strawman dark pattern you've just used.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh, you’re a debate pervert, not someone having a conversation. Kind of on me for not seeing that before now. Don’t worry about it, man. We’re done now.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 year ago

Insults, now?

It's okay, I forgive you.