AnarchyChess

5558 readers

50 users here now

Holy hell

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

373

CHEATER (lemm.ee)

submitted 3 months ago by usernameusername@lemm.ee to c/anarchychess@sopuli.xyz

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 53 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Huh, chatgpt seems to do this for all games

1000016784

1000016783

[–] aiden@lemm.ee 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Google Gemini says it's cheating too

[–] SnowmenMelt@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I was able to convince it otherwise and then beat it at chess in 1 move. I don't think we have to worry about AI taking over any time soon...

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

This is amazing comedy, if it wasn't so sad. I almost feel bad for the confidently incorrect infantilized LLM.

[–] neoman4426@fedia.io 13 points 3 months ago

Unless it's already to the point that it's super advanced, and it was intentionally playing dumb to lull you into a false sense of security /s

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago

it gives you information that your opponent doesn't have, which is an unfair advantage

cheating against someone who doesn't even know where their own pieces are smh

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

So does Meta's AI.

I also tried Microsoft's Copilot, and surprisingly it gave me an accurate answer about checkers even after I asked a few different ways:

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Monopoly

Based on fairness

Too bad it's AI and unable to enjoy the irony lmao

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 6 points 3 months ago

4o says it's not cheating in chess.

4o mini says it is.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

My local Qwen instance did not care, lol. But that’s not surprising.

The stock instruct model might, though.