this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
826 points (91.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

10442 readers
2940 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If a post is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Be nice. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements to private messages.
  7. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Democrats lost. And deserved to

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

More so than a convicted felon, rapist, and conman? Bullshit.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because this election was about the need for change, as every one since 2008 has been. As the need has gone unaddressed, voters have grown increasingly willing to embrace more extreme platforms. That Trump is a huge piece of shit that definitely won't help anyone is beside the point- he promises dramatic, systems-level changes while Democrats are offering tweaks and adjustments and generally run like it's 1996. I would say they're asleep at the wheel, but that would suggest that they're not being willfully ignorant, which I think they are. That's why they deserve the L, and why they will continue to deserve the L as long as they think that just being the lesser of two evils is a good enough platform.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know if there has ever been a US election that wasn't about change. It's an easy thing to promise because the voter can self-insert whatever they themselves think needs to be different. The candidate doesn't actually have to have a plan beyond that.

The problem with systems-level change is that it usually comes with unexpected consequences and that can cost lives. Small changes may be less satisfying but they can gradually get you the same changes in a slower but safer way.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think maybe a more helpful descriptor than big or little, as it concerns change, would be 'meaningful'. People have been yearning for meaningful change. Meaningful changes can be big, but they don't have to be. Obamacare didn't bring about socialized medicine, but still brought some meaningful change. That said, it was just one step in the right direction, but failed to be followed with more meaningful changes to a system that we've been trying to fix since Eisenhower. The more meaningful change is put off, the more desperate people become and the more urgent the problem becomes, the more people are willing to accept dramatic and unconventional changes as meaningful changes. The Democrats, to their credit, are occasionally capable of small, meaningful changes, such as investment in rail infrastructure. There's also unfortunately a lot of parading of meaningless change as meaningful, or apologetics as to why meaningful change isn't convenient just now. Repeat that for twenty years and you've basically got the post-2000s DNC platform; a few scattered, meaningful steps on disparate items, couched with a whoooooooole lot of high-octane mediocrity.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Look at the Build Back Better act. It was to be the largest investment in infrastructure, social, and environmental programs since the 1930s. It was big and meaningful.

The first part, the American Rescue Plan was enacted putting $1.9 billion in public stimulus. Republicans chiseled down the rest to a fraction of what it was supposed to be. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act is $1.2 trillion. The Inflation Reduction Act spent $891 billion on energy, climate change, and a few other things.

The problem isn't that it wasn't big or meaningful. It was. It was too big to easily understand and necessarily slow to implement. Real change takes time. More than a 4 year presidency. Real change doesn't fit in a campaign slogan. Trump lied about making change and that is easy to fit into a slogan.

[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They all deserved to lose

At least Trump had people wanting to vote for him whereas Biden/Harris was relying on people to vote against Trump instead of for them

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A hard truth is always less popular than pleasant lies.

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm truly baffled by the small but vocal set of people on Lemmy who seem unable to grasp that if the Ds lose a US election, the Rs win it. This has been going on for some time and I am no closer to understanding how they reconcile this internally

[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe because we don’t see the Ds being any better overall. On a lot yeah, but definitely it everything

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So you think the Republicans deserved to win. Got it.

[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They didn’t deserve to win; nobody deserved to win. They did for a myriad of reasons. The democrats did deserve to lose because they don’t run a candidate they support. They run a candidate that’s the lesser of two evils

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Are you familiar with the rule of excluded middle?