this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
434 points (96.6% liked)

PC Master Race

21444 readers
638 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: especially when new beginners have questions.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
_MoveSwiftly@lemmy.world
Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world
IowaMan@lemmy.world
BobaFett26@lemmy.world
The_Vampire@lemmy.world
Fudgeknuckles98@lemmy.world
CatZoomies@lemmy.world
Xeon@lemmy.ml
434
It's evolving, but backwards (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by DaddleDew@lemmy.world to c/pcmasterrace@lemmy.world
42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The next logical step of the current GPU development

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would be connected via Infinity Fabric, just like Epyc CPUs in dual-socket boards, as well as the interconnect between CPU and GPU chiplets in APUs, already are. Why would that be bad?

[โ€“] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not too well-versed with server-grade hardware but my concern is that it would end up somewhat like Intel's (consumer) CPU sockets: Changing every 2 years to ensure you need to purchase new motherboards when upgrading.