this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
8 points (70.0% liked)

AskHistorians

1329 readers
12 users here now

QUESTIONS

  1. Be civil.
  2. Be specific.
  3. Historical topic must be from at least 20 years ago.
  4. Post questions in the title. Elaboration is for the text box.

RESPONSES

  1. Be civil.
  2. Provide comprehensive answers.
  3. Please provide primary and secondary sources upon good faith request. Tertiary sources, like Wikipedia, are not accepted.

askhistorians is a community for academic answers to questions about history. Polls, opinions, bigotry, grammar pedantry, and personal insults will be removed.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here's another one: if crucifixion was considered an established way of brutally killing one, why is his suffering considered so profound, when presumably several others had gone through the same? I know it's about the return, but he could have done that after falling into a ravine or something mundane like that.

[โ€“] Doom@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 year ago

I think it's obvious looking at it this way Jesus is either

a) an amalgamation of various characters smooshed together to tell a more clear story, sort of like king Arthur..

b) a real specific story that just got a lot of attention like George Floyd or Eric Garner.