this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
1118 points (98.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

10850 readers
1603 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What right do we have? It's our imperative to spread not just ourselves, but life itself throughout the cosmos. Anything less would betray our base genetic instincts.

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you're saying that life doesn't already exist in the cosmos?

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the thing - we don't know.

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's highly probable that we aren't the only life in the universe. The only thing that makes it impossible is we aren't smart enough to know yet, but most signs point to that we can't be the only life in the universe

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We only have one data point. Until we have conclusive evidence of life beyond this world, we need to operate as if we're the only ones.

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because that's what we know! Now you're just arguing for argument's sake.

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No I'm not. Just say you don't have an answer for that haha

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My answer is that we have to work with the best evidence available because informed decisions lead to better outcomes...

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that so? And what does "informed decision" mean to you?

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Making a decision based on the best evidence available... I feel like I'm repeating myself. Oh, I see. You're trolling.

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is everyone who challenges your ideas a troll? Sorry. I'm still not trolling you OR arguing just to argue.

And let's talk about the best decisions. Did Vlad The Impaler think it was the best decision? What about Ghengis Khan? Kubla Khan? Nobunaga Oda? Mitsuhede? Washington? King George? The list goes on and on... So who's right, and who's wrong?

They all had the best evidence available, yet thought that the best way was to oppose a different idea

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then what are you saying? That we paralyze ourselves?

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What I'm saying is the best evidence available might not be the right evidence

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So when do we make decisions?

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All the time, but every aspect should be considered. For example, there was one commenter in this chain that mentioned the potential of bacterium on Mars. If they exist and we land on Mars then we inadvertently impact said bacterium and potentially impact Mars on a scale that we can't comprehend or at the very least understand. Is that right or wrong?

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, we should consider the possibility of life on Mars. But we've already impacted possible organisms by sending spacecraft there. Even if you sterilize your craft in an autoclave and send it through the vacuum of space for months to years, there's no guarantee that all terran organisms will be inert. Samples taken from an asteroid during the recent Hayabus-2 mission were found to have terrain organisms on them. If you want to completely cordon off martian ecology, you should've convinced NASA and the Soviets back in the 70s.

Bottom line is, we've already irreversibly changed the course of martian ecology, if there is any. What remains? Check if there's actually anything alive over there. The best way to do that is with boots on the ground. The best places to look for life on Mars are:

  • deep within the crust, deeper than any robotic probes can dig
  • deep under the polar ice caps
  • deep in caves and lava tubes

All of which are much easier to explore with humans.

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, I suppose that's subjective.