this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
406 points (94.5% liked)
linuxmemes
24540 readers
3115 users here now
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
- Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
- Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
2. Be civil
3. Post Linux-related content
sudo
in Windows.4. No recent reposts
5. π¬π§ Language/ΡΠ·ΡΠΊ/Sprache
6. (NEW!) Regarding public figures
We all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I3 ??!!!??111 Thatβs bloatware OUT OF MY HOUSE
Any gui rendering is bloat
Really, the metric we should be looking at is
(f+a)/b
wheref
is some subjective weighted measure of functionality,a
of aesthetic value andb
describes the bloat.No,
(f+(0.5*a))/b
.Aesthetics should never get as many points as functionality.
a
is a subjective measure of aesthetic value - as it must be, since taste is a subjective thing - you might as well include the factor already.a
is normalised against some fixed scale, but bloat (having effectively no upper limit) is impossible to normalise, it would be more reasonable to increasef
instead in order to model the fact that a larger distro may also come with more functionality.0.5*a