this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
180 points (86.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

4090 readers
178 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No pics of text

Memes are now allowed, as long as they're US centric, general political memes please see !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca

Post news related to the United States.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I just don’t see how we can reconcile the two. People want to hear her sing and they’re willing to pay a lot for it.

The main alternative I can think of is for her to sing for free and have the government pay for the production of her shows. As popular as she is I can’t see that going over well. Putting the arts under political control leads to the unnecessary politicization of the arts.

[–] tmyakal@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Or, hear me out: tax the rich.