this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
12 points (100.0% liked)

Greentext

7563 readers
1034 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It is about distinguishing addictive and damaging drugs from useful medicines with a low chance of addiction. You are not going to convince me that the majority of people that have used meth or crack are fine. Where as weed or lsd I would.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Tried meth once. Felt like Adderall. I could see why people abuse it, but I didn't feel the need.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's cause Adderall is meth.

Or meth adjacent. I don't know the chemistry.

[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No it's fucking not.

And this kind of thinking is why the local cops raided a clinic my town and why doctors in my town are now scared to prescribe it.

This is what happens when people stigmatize and demonize legal meds that actually help folks who genuinely need it.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

nah, you're the wrong here buddy

[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I take it myself and have done so for 10+ years, and know the chemistry of it. It's in the same tree, but it's absolutely not meth.

If it were meth, it'd be called meth.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Adderall is not meth, but it's still a form of speed/amphetamine and is still addictive to some neurotypical people. Maybe not as addictive or dangerous, but very much in the same category.

The reason ADHD people don't get addicted is because of their altered neurology and the doses it's prescribed at.

In fact actual meth is sometimes prescribed to ADHD patients in small doses. It's called Desoxyn.

[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Adderall is not meth, but it's still a form of speed/amphetamine

Yes. Absolutely. But it is not meth, as people keep trying to claim.

[–] Kampfkrapfen_Backup@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Adderall is amphetamine, the base compound.

Meth is methamphetamine, amphetamine with a methyl group attached to it, so it's very closely related to Adderall. That small change makes it a bit more potent, longer lasting and euphoric though.

But meth can also get prescribed for ADHD and narcolepsia (under the brand name 'Desoxyn') in very rare cases where even Adderall doesn't seem to do the trick. So basically, both substances can be used therapeutically and they both can fuck up your life if you start abusing them, with meth admittedly being more potent and dangerous than regular amphetamine.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I will!

The majority of people that have used meth or crack are fine.

Now, don't get me wrong: meth is fantastically addictive. It's the most physically addictive drug there is, as far as I'm aware. And the fantastically high addiction rate for first-time users of meth is: roughly 30%.

70% of people who try the most addictive drug in the world don't get addicted, and go on to do other things like play tennis or do their taxes or switch to weed instead.

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I am not just talking about addiction, I am also referring to the physiological damage it does.

He right I ded a mef ones time only and my brain brokeded

[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

While it's possible to cause significant damage from a single overdose I don't think it is likely from trying something at a sensible dose once. Most of the time the damage addicts have is done through repeated heavy use.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Also, afaik, alot of the damage done by things like meth and heroin are side effects. Like meth gives you psychosis and brain damage from staying up for days and not eating any food. The long term effects of meth, like a rotting mouth and permanent chemical imbalances can take years to manifest. If you want an example see people who take Adderall for years. Heroin similarly stops you from getting proper nutrition because all you want is heroin and it can give you brain damage from a lack of oxygen, which is a side effect of getting really close to overdosing.

As you've said, most people (at the very worst a whopping 70%) try these drugs and continue with their life without getting addicted. It's very dangerous to stigmatize them cause all it does is make people afraid of getting treatment.