Firefox

7021 readers

13 users here now

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 2 years ago by ravnswood@lemmy.world to c/firefox@lemmy.world

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] knightly@pawb.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Some sites don't work with ad blockers enabled.

Some foods taste bad. One simply eats different foods.

some small maintainer of neat online services (no, not Google, Meta, MS, ...) also need their bills payed.

If they can't afford to host it at no cost to the user then they should charge for it.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If they can't afford to host it at no cost to the user then they should charge for it.

That's a lot more complex than displaying some ads.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 2 years ago

It's also more respectful to users and doesn't create perverse incentives or invite third party ad servers to give their customers malware.