this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

35662 readers
5 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Holy shit, that is a sweet deal. What I think is more interesting however, is that it's also kinda revealing that they think law works like this in the West - and also what level of control they think is acceptable for a state to have.

[–] nekandro@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

This is even more extreme than Douyin's arrangement with the Chinese government lmao

It's so funny

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What I like is that the west is the one failing to stick to its own stated principles of capitalism and private property.

[–] Weslee@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Tbh I'd say it's more about the fact china doesn't allow western companies in china to do what tiktok was doing in the us.

[–] nekandro@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

I mean... These terms exceed what Douyin does in China. It's actually an insane level of concessions.