this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

35662 readers
5 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I'm not sure who would say that it was to 'stop NATO aggression'

I think the line might be "in response to" or similar, but it's parroted by tankies and russophiles.

NATO's continued expansion around them.

Can we imagine any reasons why Russia's neighbors might want to join a defensive pact to protect against Russia? No? Oh well, must be US imperialism then.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago

I'm not saying there isn't reason for those countries to want to joint an alliance against their imperialist neighbor, but honestly it's kinda hard not to see how NATO's influence has been abused for purposes other than defense.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Which happened first? NATO expansion, or Russian invasion?

There’s your answer.