this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
240 points (92.3% liked)
[Dormant] moved to !historymemes@piefed.social
3454 readers
1 users here now
THIS COMM HAS MOVED
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
... why?
Is that any more absurd than "reducing males to he/him" or "reducing females to she/her"?
It's language, not a campaign medal. You don't need a separate example for every instance.
The whole point of pronouns, I would argue, is to not need a separate set for every instance.
Otherwise you may as well just use Dan/Dan/Dan's/Danself conjugated for each name.
Pronouns:
Are (generally) shorter than names, because there's less need for them to be unique and they're used more frequently.
Can be used even when you don't know specifics about a person or object, or they don't want to give out their name.
Everyone knows how to conjugate them, so once you know someone is a 'they', you can readily extrapolate to them, their, theirs.