this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
24 points (85.3% liked)

Selfhosted

61189 readers
293 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I just start using my homelab to host some new good services, and I want to know what is the approach of a docker setup, what is the best distro for? How to deploy them correctly? Basically I'm a real noob in this subject. Thank you

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sum_yung_gai@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What is so bad about Ubuntu server?

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

When I tried it last (a couple years ago), the docker snap was an untroubleshootable mess. I don't like the idea of running Docker that way, in whatever version of a container that Canonical has come up with for snaps. It's just looking for problems. Run an application with Snap if you want, but a whole container system? No thanks.

[–] sum_yung_gai@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I just don't use snaps and it works great for me. For docker I add their apt repository and install it like that.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well, I wasn't using snaps and it still decided to install Docker snap on me. 2 days of troubleshooting before I figured out that the snap existed and was having a war with my apt install of docker. Never again.

[–] sum_yung_gai@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I avoid apt because it does silly stuff. Always use apt-get. I suppose having to know that quirk is a con of the distro.

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 1 points 2 years ago

Oh those are not the same?! TIL. Just thought they made it more convenient.

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I wrote a script to remove snaps and install Docker as per the docker website. Works great mate.

Plus you get the benefit of frequent updates.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I don't need what Ubuntu offers to run server applications, and Debian is rock solid and predictable. Might as well go to the source since it's Debian all the way down anyway, just with added cruft.

[–] numanair@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

One of their frequent updates completely broke docker on my system. Fortunately they did push the fix by the time I realized what happened.

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is that because you installed it via snaps instead of apt?

[–] numanair@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It was from docker's apt repo, so a newer version than provided through Ubuntu's channels I assume.

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

APT install is the same for Debian as it is for Ubuntu. Ubuntu delivers docker through APT or Snap but defaults snap.