this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
325 points (97.9% liked)

Selfhosted

60426 readers
228 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I saw this post and I was curious what was out there.

https://neuromatch.social/@jonny/113444325077647843

Id like to put my lab servers to work archiving US federal data thats likely to get pulled - climate and biomed data seems mostly likely. The most obvious strategy to me seems like setting up mirror torrents on academictorrents. Anyone compiling a list of at-risk data yet?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I don't self-host it, I just use archive.org. That makes it available to others too.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s a single point of failure though.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

In that they're a single organization, yes, but I'm a single person with significantly fewer resources. Non-availability is a significantly higher risk for things I host personally.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 33 points 2 years ago

There was the attack on the Internet archive recently, are there any good options out there to help mirror some of the data or otherwise provide redundancy?

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yes. This isn't something you want your own machines to be doing if something else is already doing it.

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

But then who backs up the backups?

I guess they back either other up. Like archive.is is able to take archives from archive.org but the saved page reflects the original URL and the original archiving time from the wayback machine (though it also notes the URL used from wayback itself plus the time they got archived it from wayback).

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Realize how how much they are supporting and storing.

Come back to the comments after.

[–] Deebster@infosec.pub 9 points 2 years ago

Your argument is that a single backup is sufficient? I disagree, and I think that so would most in the selfhosted and datahoarder communities.