this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
38 points (95.2% liked)

World News

45757 readers
2657 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I mean it's not the companies operating the facilities we put our trust in, but the outside regulators whose job it is to ensure these facilities are safe and meet a certain standard. As well as the engineers and scientists that design these systems.

Nuclear power isn't 100% safe or risk-free, but it's hella effective and leaps and bounds better than fossil fuels. We can embrace nuclear, renewables and fossil free methods, or just continue burning the world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The worst nuclear disaster has led to 1,000sq miles of land being unsafe for human inhabitants.

Using fossil fuels for power is destroying of the entire planet.

It's really not that complicated.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Except that nuclear isn't the only, or even the cheapest, alternative to fossil fuels.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

If solar was used everywhere then it would also require a large investment in batteries to power stuff in the night There's pros and cons for everything and probably the best solution is to have several green energy sources, solar, wind, nuclear ect.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Except that powering the world with nuclear would require thousands of reactors and so much more disasters. This doesn't even factor the space abandonned to store «normal» toxic materials.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This doesn't even factor the space abandonned to store «normal» toxic materials.

You mean under ground from where it was dug out?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The plant itself, water inevitably getting in contact with wastes and leaking also.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You mean water under ground? It was in contact million years before any of us was born.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Million years were sufficient for the radioactivity to decay before life started to evolve on earth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Then how does it fuel nuclear reactors?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

Both sound terrible.

I don’t really want to pick the lessor of two evils when it comes to the energy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Don’t push nuclear power like it’s the only option though.

Where I live we entirely provide energy from hydro power plants and nuclear energy is banned. We use no fossil fuels. We have a 35 year plan for future growth and it doesn’t include any fossil fuels. Nuclear power is just one of the options and it has many hurdles to implement, maintain and decommission.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It would be cool to see huge investments into battery storage. If we could create a battery that doesn't just leak energy from storing, we could generate power in one location and ship it out where it's needed. There could be remote energy production plants using geothermal or hydroelectric power that ship out these charged batteries to locations all over. It would let us better utilize resources instead of having to have cities anchored around these sources.

Or we could generate a ton of power all at once, store it and use it as needed rather having to have on demand energy production

Hell with better batteries even fossil fuels begin to be climate friendly since you could store the massive energy created and know you're using close to 100% of it.