this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
190 points (100.0% liked)

Steam Hardware

19782 readers
16 users here now

A place to discuss and support all Steam Hardware, including Steam Deck, Steam Machine, Steam Frame, and SteamOS in general.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Deck] - Steam Deck related.
[Machine] - Steam Machine related.
[Frame] - Steam Frame related.
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

If your post is only relevant to one hardware device (Deck/Machine/Frame/etc) please specify which one as part of the title or by using a device flair.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

you can always just run the games at that resolution

[–] DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's fair. I'd just rather not pay for pixels I won't use (/s)

[–] anlumo@feddit.org 37 points 1 year ago

Just donate the extra pixels to charity, problem solved!

[–] SoJB@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

There’s also an argument to be made for the pixels not being an ideal multiple. Maybe it matters less when there are 3440x1440 of them on a traditional screen, but the blurriness caused by this effect at small screen sizes is quite noticeable on text.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

i think screens look blurry in the wrong resolution. i always rather use it in the native resolution. that effect will probably be more noticeable in a low ppi screen like the deck's.

[–] yonder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, but they will have to be upscaled somehow, which will noticeably reduce clarity.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

FSR2/XeSS upscaling pretty much acts as free anti aliasing, making it look better. And you get better UI rendering.

[–] yonder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I personally find the sharpened look of FSR to look really bad to the point where I prefer conventional bilinear upscaling, not to mention that using FSR also uses precious compute time on weaker systems.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

FSR1 is pretty bad as it's just upscaling the static image, I agree.
FSR2/3, XeSS and DLSS are temporal, meaning they use info from the previous frames to construct a higher resolution image that gives much better results. They also need to be implemented in the game engine, meaning not every game supports them.

[–] yonder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

That might explain why I don't have the highest opinion of FSR. I've only used it in Counter Strike 2 and Godot. I've never tried XeSS or DLSS but thanks to your comment I just learned that XeSS can apparently run non intel GPU vendors from their github page

[–] morgan_423@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Or at 720p, as this is a 16:9 aspect ratio, and running stuff on it at 16:10 will look weird.