Minneapolis - St. Paul Metro

1048 readers

1 users here now

About

A community for leftists and progressives within the Minneapolis - St. Paul Metro Area, including all suburbs and exurbs.

Community banner courtesy of @maven@lemmy.zip ❤️

Guidelines

Be nice
Comment substantively
Probably some other stuff

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Revolutionary_Code@midwest.social

m_f@midwest.social

-1

Tice: Walz is wrong about the Electoral College (www.startribune.com)

submitted 1 year ago by m_f@midwest.social to c/msp@midwest.social

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://archive.is/J5YK7

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] m_f@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't agree with it but it's worth reading. The crux of the argument is this:

Consider this: In 2016, Hillary Clinton famously won the nationwide popular vote by nearly 3 million votes, but lost the election to Donald Trump in the Electoral College, doing much to enflame American progressives’ distaste for the college. What’s worth noting is that Clinton’s popular vote margin that year within the borders of California was well over 4 million votes. In short, outside California, Trump won the popular vote across 49 states.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, it turns out that changing the data changes the results 🙄

Since we're just doing random shit and seeing what it looks like, how much did she win by if we remove Texas?

[–] m_f@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I misread the argument and thought it was saying something more interesting 🤦 It's actually a silly argument and now I regret posting the article, but at least there was some good discussion of how bad it is.

[–] Sierra_Is_Bee@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

So they're argument is that Californians are worth less than the rest of America? Glad our votes here are worth less than one to them :/

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don't know if that makes any kind of point. Republicans don't win national majorities. It's not relevant which parcels of land they live on - land doesn't vote (at least at the present, I'm sure someone at the heritage foundation is working on it)