this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
327 points (99.1% liked)

Opensource

4607 readers
75 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Anyone who disagrees ought to go get their own term rather than appropriating "Open Source" and/or "Free Software".

I've heard "source available" used.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nobody owns this term so who’s appropriating?

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

You claim ownership of „open source”? That’s wild. Your lawyer can speak to my lawyer, I guess.

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"free software" very clearly means some software you can use for free (which this isn't), but "open source" very clearly means openly accessible source code, which this is.

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

"Free Software" very clearly means this, and "Open Source" very clearly means this.

Again, get your own terms. "Freeware" and "source available" are just sitting right there.