this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2026
327 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

89747 readers
3838 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PinkBalaclava@sh.itjust.works 23 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, a bit weirdly phrased to me as well, but the first line of the article clears it up

Speaker Julie Menin’s legislation will prevent companies from using personal data to offer different prices to different New Yorkers

[–] RepleteLocum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Isn't that just price gouging?

[–] NuanceDemon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

They can overlap. Price gouging means charging excessively high prices, especially when people have little choice during shortages or emergencies. Its basically demand based pricing, a fairly normal economic principle, taken to extremes.

Surveillance pricing means using personal data to estimate what you're willing to pay and tailoring your price accordingly. Two people could be buying the same product at the same time and see different prices because the company thinks it can squeeze more out of one of them.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 hours ago

It still allows mass gouging you cant be price gouged different than anyone else though. So stops price tags that would change by who's near them.

[–] username_1@discuss.tchncs.de -4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, that's better. But titles are important. Why would I even click on the link if I don't understand the title? "Draft prediction of isomorphic amino-acids transition schedules".

[–] PinkBalaclava@sh.itjust.works 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I click on it because I don't understand the title. It's not even clickbait or exaggerated, just a bit oddly phrased. With the added context of that first sentence, the title also makes perfect sense.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

It's only oddly phrased if you aren't used to headline style writing, aka headlinese