Yeah those are all very fair point. I didn't want to under play him and his role in the company but also that he is much more replaceable than Jobs was. Jenson is good at what he does but also doesn't appear to be unique other than being in the right place at the right time. He is a brilliant example of survivorship bias, Nvidia could have crumbled many times over but they just managed to hold on by pure luck.

It also cannot be understated the level of mental brain damage Job's did to every other major player in silicon valley. He was a very unique marketing guy that managed to be the CEO in a blossoming field of technology, he had taste that few others in the field had and knew how to cultivate the necessary communication skills to spread it, and every other CEO has been envious of it ever since. The closest we have had since is Elon Musk, and that is just sad.

I think that Steve Jobs is a ghost that has haunted big tech ever since his passing as the rest of the industry has been floating aimless ever since, it is probably good in a weird way that Jobs passed when he did because I don't know what he could have done much different. His legacy would have diminished with time I feel. I suspect this is why as soon as something came a long that looked novel, generative AI, that is why they all jumped on so hard and inorganically. Huang is probably the single person who are benefited the most from this personally, but it wasn't planned it was just being there is the right hardware just as it was needed.