this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2026
524 points (99.8% liked)

Fight For Privacy

168 readers
485 users here now

Privacy is a fundamental human right, we have to fight for in data capitalism.

Everything about privacy, and means , from legal to obfuscation we can use to protect human way of life

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Fortnine actually made a video explaining how Google's ads are a scam.

In a nutshell, they don't convince people to buy things. They predict that someone is about to buy something, shows ads for it and then take credit for the purchase.

[–] ComicalMayhem@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For a second there I was wondering why Fortnite of all things was making a video on this

[–] VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Right, when they can host concerts then why can't they do courses on privacy or ads?

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A coworker scrolling mentioned double stuffed Oreos, something she hadn’t had in a while. Boom, next ad: double stuffed Oreos. “They” really are listening.

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That isn't how it works, listening to conversations would need too much bandwidth or processing power to be useful.

More likely that whatever prompted your coworker to think about those cookies also triggered the ad.

Or they have been getting those ads without thinking twice about them until they noticed when they were thinking about them.

Or it is just plain coincidence.

[–] FudgyMcTubbs@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Nope. I worked as a marketing director before I remembered that I have a soul. A radio advertising rep tried to sell me passive listening ads.

According to that rep selling this service, it worked like this: All of these devices, including your phone, passively listen for keywords that get repeated frequently enough in a short enough window. They feed those words back to the mothership. An ad is then delivered across all ID associated devices targeted toward that keyword. This process is delivering an ad within 45 minutes.

For example, you talk about needing a new tent, you're gonna say tent and camping a few times in that convo. Camping/tent get beamed up. Within 45 minutes, you're seeing tent/camping ads in your apps and on websites across all of your devices because of your advertising ID.

It is not coincidence. They are literally selling this feature to their clients.

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yep. Guy I know cut off his finger using a table saw. They were able to sew it back on, and he was fine. But while he was recovering in the ER, his phone was served up ads for Sawstops (for those who aren’t into woodworking, these are table saws with advanced safety features that would have prevented this injury).

At that point he hadn’t even typed in on his phone yet what happened, but obviously people (himself, doctors, nurses, intake folks, etc) had been discussing the accident around him for hours at that point. It was pretty obvious that on some level his phone was listening to what was talked about. This was in 2012…

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

I had a phone call with a friend of mine, who told me that a person we both knew had lupus. We talked about it for a minute or two, because I’d only heard about it on house and didn’t know what it involved. Starting that afternoon, I got ads for lupus for about two weeks. I know I hadn’t received those ads before because I play a word game for which “lupus” is a really useful word, and I had not seen its spelling before then.

This was about 15 years ago. It could be a coincidence (but I’m not the age or race most predisposed to lupus), but I’ve been a believer in phones listening to you since.

[–] mefisdo_dot_info@lemmy.ca 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that only count if the buyer actually bought the stuff through clicking on the ad?

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

No. Watch the video they explain it well