politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
If Democrats have any hope of winning the 2028 election, they need to learn how to walk and chew gum at the same time
Instead of loudly investigating and quietly going about normal business, they should quietly investigate and loudly go about the business of unwinding trunos fuck ups.
There needs to be accountability, but there also needs to be a change. If they can't do both, the same will happen again.
It's really strange, we pay these people to act as our representatives full time, drafting and proposing and voting on legislation. So why don't we see more action?
I understand that when the GOP controls congress, nothing is going to come up for a vote unless they're certain they want it to. But Democrats could still be introducing bills and spending time trying to force public awareness. And for a Democratic controlled congress even if they can't control the presidential veto, like we're about to see, why on earth shouldn't they be passing major bills every week or two? Even if the president vetoes them, that is how you keep voters' imagination and loyalty from drifting to the GOP, so I really hope that's what we see.
Yet somehow I suspect we're going to get into the driver's seat and hear about maybe two or three bills a year, all attempted to be "bipartisan." That's why I'm so anxious to get Jeffries and Schumer out - they can't imagine Congress acting any other way.
Because the American politics system with four fucking elected bodies, is dumb as shit and literally intentionally designed to make government ineffective.
An elected Senate and an elected House makes zero fucking sense. You just roadblock yourself constantly. The president being elected separately from either also makes no fucking sense.
And then the fact that your judiciary is like half elected is the most nonsense fucking bullshit on the planet.
Your system of government is not built or designed to be effective.
They should wait till he’s out of office for the charge though.
Imagine if people could do 2 things at once. What a world we would live in, if that was true.
Yeah, but this is 54-56 senators and 250+ representatives. They can’t possibly do 2 things different things amongst all of them.
Does the American public have the attention to pay attention to two things at once? No.
Do you not remember that Trump was impeached and didn't move the voting needle one iota? The American public does not care about anything other than their pocket book.
Didn’t move the voting needle, one iota, did it? Because as I recall, he lost the next election.
And won the one after that.
That’s not moving the needle, that’s shifting the goalposts
Lol, no it's not.
You interpreted my comment as focusing exclusively on the single next presidential election, while I always meant the bigger picture.
The right wing and swing voters in America by and large did not care about impeachment. They voted in maga republicans after maga republican, and not only returned him to power, but also elected a majority Republican Senate and House that loudly and enthusiastically endorsed him.
Just saying “nuh-uh!” And then doubling down doesn’t make for a good counter argument.
Oh, I see, it’s my fault you can’t make a logical argument.
So you triple down with an ad hominem… At least you’re consistent
Apparently, it’s you that has problem with reading comprehension, since you missed the several comments where I pointed out the flaws in your argument. And the best you can do is schoolyard insults?
Not very convincing.
Go on, keep deflecting by trying to discuss anything other than your flawed argument.
Very convincing
Why do gifs make you so mad?