this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2026
894 points (95.8% liked)

Funny

16757 readers
25 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sunsofold@lemmy.zip 48 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Again:

Do not share advertisements. They are toxic to society, always based in a lie, and never of benefit. Making fun of them is not better than genuinely shilling for the company. Block ads. Destroy them where possible. Seek to have them banned wherever possible. They are not welcome on Lemmy, and if you are going to share them, neither are you.

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mustve missed the part where everyone decided you have unilateral decision making over who gets to participate here.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 weeks ago

the meeting was last tuesday at 15:00 - didn't you read the memo?

[–] NalosLayor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wish taggers would target ads instead of public buildings and infrastructure or even normal businesses.

[–] sunsofold@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

Thinking back, it does seem like tagging shows up more on infrastructure than adspace but I think that might just be because there is a lot more money invested by advertisers in replacing ads than there ever is on cleaning/repainting public structures. The signs at sporting events and billboards change hands or are updated fairly regularly by the nature of the advertising company moving to a new client whenever a contract ends, but walls and public signage are often only replaced or repainted once every few years at best.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

@ryannathans

I feel like that slogan is a lawsuit waiting to happen.

@sunsofold

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

@ryannathans

“The lawsuit was not about literal wings.”

Well, that's boring. 😛

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] ducktumn@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Advertisements are not bad. We have to regulate them though. If you do not want advertisements then every single service you use would be paid.

[–] sunsofold@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago

If the cost of not having the toxic lies of advertising trying to trick people, the toxic effects of the ad-based business model corrupting all of our media, and the toxic effects of advertising-based political campaigns, is to have to pay a few pennies to someone providing a service I actually want, I don't see a downside.

[–] knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 weeks ago

Why would Linux charge me if there would be no advertisements?

My library fees are so low literally anyone should be able to pay them.