218
You Can See Everything review – Nathan Fielder’s Elizabeth Holmes doc is a modern masterpiece of deceit
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2026
218 points (97.4% liked)
Movies
14376 readers
46 users here now
Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!
Related Communities:
!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.
!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.
!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.
While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
-
Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
-
Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
-
Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
-
Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.
Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.
Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.
Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think that's an incredibility compassionate take, and for that I instantly and unconditionally love you.
I think compassionate people tend to trip on something, and I think you're tripping on it right now. I think other people trip in the opposite direction. Let me explain:
When you watch a nature doc where a lion hunts some poor baby antelope, maybe you're rooting for the antelope. It just wants to live. But the lion has to eat. It's incompatible. Just to be a dick I always say to my wife "think of the the baby lions that'll starve if the lion doesn't catch an antelope!".
They're fundamentally incompatible outcomes. You can accept that, choose who you're going to root for (or neither), remain empathetic to both. It isn't NECESSARY to reject empathy for one to root for the other. It's your mind playing a trick on you to save you from feeling bad for whoever gets screwed. You can sit with something bittersweet.
Is this putting ND on blast? YEP. Is it providing a vehicle for people being abused by people with ND to recognize that? YEP.
Fundamentally incompatible outcomes. It's completely reasonable to hold a position like "I hate that this puts ND on blast, but ultimately this leads to the better outcome". I think "this is the better outcome... And people with a legitimate disorder can eat shit" is not.