this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2026
1035 points (99.1% liked)

Facepalm

3733 readers
2 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's possible, but a pain. I have an html python portal for a self hosted set of LLMs where I can upload a file of any length, and it pulls it apart maybe 400 words at a time to proofread, copyedit, or translate, then stitches it back together. It does mostly OK. But it doesn't look at things like plot points or consistency or characters. Instead, I could do 1 chapter at a time into Claude, compress it to a two-page summary, and get then have it analyze the summaries.

Which sounds like a great way to get terrible results and burn more tokens than I need to pay two humans to her the info I need.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yea just a waste of tokens really, this kind of stuff is for humans, like a billion other things

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It’s really hard to avoid sycophancy when proofing more than a paragraph at a time, anyway. They will not set you straight.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago

That's the benefit of the small context window and self hosting. It proofs 3 or 4 sentences at a time looking for spanning and grammar issues based on the kind of work. Plus I'm using Qwen and Hermes, you just tell them to be harsh and they do.