this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2026
334 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

89005 readers
2523 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Under the radar, those "environmentalists" were possibly funded by petroleum companies.

[–] redballooon@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

No we weren't. We were fucking scared when theoretical statistics about nuclear accidents actually manifested in the real world, and didn't want to have one of those in our neighborhood. so we took the opportunity to shut it down when it presented itself.

Those people who were funded by petroleum simultaneously made sure to delay wind and solar as long as they possibly could, and that is while we're still stuck at coal and gas. Those same people have the majority of the vote nowadays once again, and you can watch them do it again: even though wind and solar is the most economic choice by now, they are doing what they can to slow it down.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

they are doing what they can to slow it down

... to slow down wind, solar and nuclear, exactly.

[–] redballooon@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Not really. They sometimes bring the nuclear idea to the table as an alleged alternative to solar and wind. But the reality is that in today's democracies nuclear is near impossible to build for a variety of reasons. It's never a real alternative, only one to slow down wind and solar.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago

For as long as I can remember, the entire world has had 400-something running nuclear power plants. I suspect 400-something is a fundamental nuclear constant.