this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2026
186 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

15681 readers
681 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] voytrekk@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are specialized chips in development that have ve already proved to be faster, cheaper, and less power hungry. The second they become generally available, any new data center not using them would be foolish.

That being said, we are talking about gamers who will just continue to buy Nvidia in the future despite how awful they treat us.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Why would Nvidia release them?

They can continue to make current-gen chips and charge outrageous premiums. Why would they ever go to the trouble and expense of tooling for a new die when people are buying what they have now for (nearly) any price?