this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2026
508 points (99.2% liked)

PC Gaming

15659 readers
814 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just a little amusing and not that surprising.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There needs to be an awkward time. It was the exact same way when higher resolution first took off. I thought the Prestige looked bad because you could see the set work. The high resolution stayed though and they figured out the tricks to make things look good. High frame rate never got that chance

[โ€“] Natanael@infosec.pub 2 points 6 days ago

4:3 to 16:9 releases were fun because a lot of shows captured part of the set on the sides, which otherwise always got cut for TV. But then the DVD releases shows you everything lol