this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2026
412 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

88877 readers
3038 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
412
Being mean to AI could get you banned as Anthropic introduces new rules against abusing Claude (www.techspot.com)
submitted 1 week ago by spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

WTF?! You might have heard the one about being nice to chatbots in case they remember you once the machines take over. It seems Anthropic is heeding this warning, barring users from being excessively abusive or cruel toward its AI models.

Anthropic's first changes to its usage policy in over a year include new restrictions on abusive behavior. The updated policy prohibits "sustained and needless abusive or cruel behavior" toward its models.

Don't worry if you're a Claude user who occasionally gets annoyed at the chatbot and throws a few expletives its way. The policy update only applies in extreme cases, in which users repeatedly act cruelly toward the models for no discernible reason.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The problem is they're not managing the training data. There is no one sitting there making sure all the data that gets retained for training is "good" data, they're just expecting everything it sees to be "good" data.

Just like the data hoovered up from the internet that was used to build the models wasn't vetted either, which is why AI goes wrong SO often...

[โ€“] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

It's fairly simple to just run automated analysis on data quality once you already have a decent LLM though. Claude would definitely be able to.

And they have people doing that manually too, or perhaps it was OpenAI. Someone got angry at their underpaid contractors for using AI to create training data lol