this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2026
294 points (100.0% liked)

World News

58413 readers
1580 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This is not Judaism. This is conservatism.

Conservatives are violent by nature and thrive on the suffering of others. This is why every war and every genocide in human history has been caused exclusively by conservatives.

[–] Ostrichgrif@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I kind of agree with you but that's a sweeping generalization, what do you make of Uyghers in China?

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not a sweeping generalization. It's an observable fact. Regarding Uyghers in China, it's possible for conservatives to oppress and genocide other conservatives. The world is not zero-sum.

[–] hereforgoodtakes@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

This feels like a no true scotsman thing. I get it because I don't like "conservatism" either, but are we going to call Stalin a conservative?

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

100% yes. Stalin was absolutely a conservative. He even targeted and murdered progressives. You will find that neither communism nor socialism require progressives to be in charge in order to exist.

Modern China is another great example of conservative-led communism.

[–] hereforgoodtakes@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

But does "conservative" to you just mean violent, repressive, and pro-authoritarian?

I'm against all those things, and I think Stalin and Hitler have a lot in common despite Stalin being "left" and "Hitler" being right, but I dont see how it serves you to call everyone who acts violently and unjustifiably towards their people a conservative.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Stalin was socially conservative, the opposite of socially progressive. That is how I am using the term. The same way that Russian and Chinese governments are led by conservatives and not progressives.