TechTakes

2722 readers

236 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

dgerard@awful.systems

216

Anthropic: Could AI be conscious? Pope Leo: lol, no (pivot-to-ai.com)

submitted 1 day ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

‘Algorithms lack the spark of humanity’

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VCWgoIrRCo&list=UU9rJrMVgcXTfa8xuMnbhAEA - video
https://pivottoai.libsyn.com/20261005-anthropic-could-ai-be-conscious-pope-leo-lol-no - podcast

time: 7 min 58 sec

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] cstross@wandering.shop 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

@Zensate You seem to believe in "atheist values", but they are not: speaking as an atheist raised in a non-Christian religion, what you're talking about are specifically *Christian* atheist values—they embed a bunch of Christian eschatalogical assumptions even as they reject the core thesis. So you have *far* more in common, belief-wise, with the Pope, than you do with an ex-Hindu or ex-Jewish or ex-Buddhist atheist.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world -4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Buddhists are, by definition, atheist

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This is wrong in a couple different ways, lol

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world -2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

please enlighten us

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 6 points 12 hours ago

nah it's better thematically/narratively if you explore it yourself