this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2026
534 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

88784 readers
2965 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If Coca Cola didn't turn 2800 million litres of water into soda, people would drink that 2800 million litres of water in some other form anyway. Same goes for any company that creates drinks of any kind, it isn't "consumed" in the process. If water ever truly can be, it always evaporates and rains down somewhere.

And depending on where you live versus where it's bottled, not doing so might in fact be rather disastrous. In many densely populated areas of the world the scarcity of fresh water is cause by the water cycle not being balanced - water is gathered from vast area and piped to a city, but when it is "consumed" and returns to the water cycle, it doesn't rain back to those collection areas. Like for example, most of the entire west of the United States.

[โ€“] Frettchen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Now think of when there is no choice. How much do you think that soda gets?