this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2026
537 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

88519 readers
3249 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Seeing Blackbird fly again after all these years would be incredible. I'd love to know what NASA has planned for it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I love the blackbird / a-12 / yf-12 family. They're truly the pinnacle of pre-computerized engineering in many ways. Most of the design was completed before 1960 - a mach 3 aircraft, made with slide rules and deeeeep institutional knowledge. People joked that Kelly Johnson could see air, he was so good at designing aircraft and anticipating problems.

that said: why bring it back?

it's gotta be a successor - I don't know if we could bring the airframes back to operational status, and the fuel situation is wacky. does anyone even make jp7 anymore? panther piss?

and even if you could bring it back to operational status, and supply the specialized tankers (most tankers fuel from a common supply they run off of, but the jp7 carrying tankers for the sr-71 have a separate tank just for the blackbird) and train everyone up, the blackbird is visible from hundreds of miles away on modern radar. It was stealthier than most of it's peers but never a stealth aircraft like the f117.

This all tells me: it's gotta be a new toy.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just remember NASA are the ones doing this, not the air force. I don't think they want to use it as a spy plane, and if they were designing a successor, you'd expect it to be the air force, or someone like DARPA doing this.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

yet another reason to not bring the sr71 back - nasa used them for decades for testing, dunno what else they'd need it for.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Did they? Never knew that. I’ll take your word for it as well.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Thank you and thanks for the good read

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago

Testing for something or other.

They’ve done this before. It’s not new to NASA