this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026
812 points (99.3% liked)
Political Memes
12605 readers
815 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Like in the strictest sense, yes she's not a citizen so it's 'foreign'. But it's not that deep?
She's been problematic online long enough for someone to publish an journal article on it: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8590827/
People have speculated the Trump support early in his admin was because she wants pardons for people in her life, or help with citizenship, as she's had legal trouble in the past too. Or maybe she just likes money? Time Magazine had an article earlier this year about how important celebrity endorsement has become to the campaign, and how Minaj became involved.
The article contains this passage:
And that gives you entitlement how?! You are ONE citizen, with ONE vote, you are no more or less "important" than anyone else. Money should not buy you influence, that it does buy influence is a bug, not a feature.
In before "it's a feature, system is working as intended": imho it's a bug in the democracy subsystem that is intentionally caused and exploited by how the overarching system was implemented.
Yes, I'm a software developer.
It is a feature though. Its not a big as it is working as intended.
If we really want to break it down...
Democracy is not meant to work that way. The feature-contracts it implements is "one person, one vote" and "rule through a majority of votes".
If you are able to break that contract because of how surrounding systems interact with the democracy subsystem, that means it's a bug or vulnerability for democracy, used as an exploit by the overarching system implementing the democracy interface.
This has never been true in the US at the federal level for the president, and arguably the house.
The president, by definition, is voted in via land. We can make all the arguments we want about the delegates voting based on the state's vote, but we've seen just how tenuous that is, and that's not even getting into the multiple instances of republicans winning despite having less votes.
The house is technically “rule through a majority of votes”, but they get elected to gerrymandered as fuck districts. They literally redistrict the land to pick their voters, which IMO, invalidates the idea that they “rule through a majority of votes”.
That quote is kind of crazy, like Karen yelling at a clerk level of entitlement combined with not knowing what taxes are or where they go.
whe she sang her so "You a hoe", she meant herself no doubt.