225
this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026
225 points (96.3% liked)
Shitty Movie Details
1844 readers
179 users here now
Share your favorite movie (and other motion picture media) details, potentially with a shitty twist.
To be clear, this is a place for satirical and meta^2^ references. Not really the actual movie details, unless they're truly stupid or have strong meme potential/background. "Oh hai Mark" kind of stuff. Tho sometimes even these can span a good debate.
For maximum funni, include full name of the movie, its release date and all the detail right in the title of the post.
Try to avoid actual shit and other nasty stuff. Mark nsfw when appropriate.
For shitty videogame details, there's !shittygamedetails@lemmy.world
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Have fun.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That movie had much potential to deliver a radical message about inequalities but it turned to a centrist crap
Why do you think it was centrist? I thought it died due to its over the top messaging, like this meme suggests.
The film starts within a revolution of marginalized and low class societies, but that is not how the movie evolved , instead in the second part it switched to be another cringy hacking action hollywood crap with ending morals of rich and poor can now be doing brunches togather.
Really? I didn't get that at all. I was wondering, after that ending, when would the committees form and the executions begin a la 1917.
I mean even liberals came with the same conclusion as many class consciousness critics
That should tells you something about how bad the movie went.
The false message of that movie
I read your link, and all it talks about, in its two paragraphs, is 'Matt Damon is white' (white looking Mexicans don't exist apparently) and that 'it didn't rouse people up sufficiently, therefore it's bad propaganda'.
Matt is white and the movie is not good as a movie.
I mentioned in my reply that even liberals came with a conclusion about the no point of the movie and it is swinging towards cringe holywood narratives.
The guy writing the article shifted to identity politics which is something i really dont care about, but he is true about the end message being “no message” except centric dogma that everything is fine and
What centrist dogma? That the proletariat should rise and capture the means of power?
Again, the ending had no brunches, it was basically the start of a violent retribution against the bourgeoisie.