this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026
839 points (98.1% liked)
People Twitter
10437 readers
70 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician
- https://www.sotwe.com/
- https://twitterviewer.net/Note: Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
- If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This avoids OP’s point. When you get charged, the charges appear instantly, sure it might not be fully verified.
But when you get a refund, it does not appear instantly. There is absolutely no reason why it shouldn’t.
Also, I’m always very annoyed that banking apps can’t do a simple and proper summary in which verified and unverified transactions just appear normally with a little tag and the total charges just adds those up.
It’s just simple math and accounting, idk why they have to make the interface painful. Regardless of what the status of the transaction is, it’s verification status should be a label, not make it appear in purgatory only to disappear for a day to finally show up.
I think you're missing a point. Person A spends X dollars at person B's store. Person A immediately sees X dollars reduced from their bank account, and it shows as pending. Person B does NOT immediately see X dollars added to their account. For some duration, that money is just on hold while the bank verifies and processes the payment. Meanwhile Person A gets whatever they bought for X dollars on the promise and expectation that the bank will soon pass along that payment. Person B may not actually retrieve that money for several days, though.
Now Person A comes back for a refund, so Person B submits that refund back to them. The exact same process happens in reverse with the bank. Depending on the company, there may be an extra internal accounting/fraud review process for the business before the refund is actually submitted to the bank, which adds more time. But whether it does or doesn't, the time it takes for that money to transfer between accounts is entirely out of the business' control.
My family owns and run multiple retail fireworks stores, and I work in sales data for a major retail chain. I have personally handled many times when someone got overcharged for their transaction, like if an item got scanned twice by mistake. We immediately run a refund for the over charge in such cases. We are not delaying it at all. It still takes days to hit their account again, though. It has nothing to do with us or our processor how long that takes. If you have a problem with it, talk to your bank. They are choosing not to front you the money we refunded. It is already gone from our account, and is sitting in pending state.