this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2026
937 points (98.2% liked)

memes

23129 readers
2050 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Just in case anybody is stupid enough to believe this, there was nothing radioactive in old CRT-based TVs. And they sometimes had black cases but weren't a "black box".

They worked by bending a beam of electrons that hit phosphors in the screen, which is cool enough that saying stupid BS about "radioactive" is unnecessary.

[–] lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

CRTs can emit X-Rays, but they are properly shielded so they never leave the tube.

The X-Ray scare mostly came from a line of GE TV's in 1968 that had improper shielding and had to be recalled.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Radioactivity and X-Rays are tangentially related, but they're not at all the same thing.

[–] Equinox1289@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

One is from a decaying material and the other is from controlled electron beam, but they are both radiation emitters. People are just more familiar with the term radioactive and think it is the catch-all term for a source of radiation.

The electron gun in a tv and in an xray machine are pretty similar and without shielding, you will still get hit with radiation even if it isn't strictly radioactive, but rather another type of radiation emitter.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

One is from a decaying material

Specifically radioactive decay.

the other is from controlled electron beam

So, not radioactivity.

Radiation is a really vague term. It's just energy moving in the form of waves or particles. Sunlight is radiation. Radio waves are radiation. Microwaves are radiation. Wifi is radiation.

Radiation can be dangerous in a few ways. Something can be very bright and blind you, or it can cause you to heat up too much. X-rays are an example of ionizing radiation, that's dangerous because it can break apart molecular bonds, causing damage to cells. That's why you can get skin cancer from ultraviolet radiation. X-rays are a shorter wavelength than ultraviolet light, so there's more potential cellular damage per photon.

But, radioactivity is dangerous not just because of X-rays, but primarily because of alpha and beta particles, and because of even higher energy particles like gamma particles / rays.

So, just because there's one type of ionizing radiation that can come from a CRT-TV that is also peripherally associated with radioactive decay doesn't mean that there's any connection between a TV and radioactivity.

That would be like saying that an atomic bomb causes a huge explosion, and a fertilizer bomb also causes a huge explosion, so a fertilizer bomb is a nuke.

[–] Squirrelanna@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

This isn't me arguing against you because I know very little about the difference. But when I started reading I thought this was a Unidan copypasta 😂

[–] zekas@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yes the humor was in the vagueness

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

beam of electrons

Let's say it cooler: they were particle accelerators you pointed at your face.

Also, massive glass vacuum bottles that could implode if mishandled.

And with massive capacitors that could electrocute you if mishandled.

And heavy enough to seriously crush your foot (and possibly implode and electrocute you) if mishandled.

And the static electricity felt really neat on the back of your hand if you put it close to the screen.

They were so fucking cool, and we took them for granted, and now they're gone, and life is significantly less cool without them.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

But by fuck was their capacity to put out a clear image mid. But their screen size on the other hand …extremely limited

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

TVs, maybe¹. CRT monitors, though? They were great. And mostly didn't care about what resolution you threw at them.

  1. It's a big maybe, though. Live TV? Sure, but that was more on the extremely low resolution signal than on the screen (HDTV would've looked great on a CRT). But games? They were fantastic for games, though. Artists designed their images with CRT's natural blur on mind, and now we need complex filters and at least a 4K monitor to replicate the original look.

[–] eah@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

If you squint, you can make the right side look like the left side. Kind of amazing. Instantly increase resolution with this one weird trick.

[–] Tabula_stercore@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

First one is from Final Fantasy 6, second one from Castlevania: Symphony of the Night.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

They looked amazing for games designed for them, specifically because they blurred the pixels. If what you want is crisp lines or vivid colors, CRT works against you

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And heavy enough to seriously crush your foot (and possibly implode and electrocute you) if mishandled.

Sometimes. Other times they were little portable things.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I mean, sure. But even this little 4'' “pocket” thing, for instance, still weighed 1.2Kg... that's a damn dense (and expensive) brick to drop on a toe...

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

1.2 kg isn't very much, especially for a dense piece of electronics.

If you look at the history of iMac computers, when they went from CRTs to flat screens they only dropped 6 kg from 15.7 kg to 9.6 kg. Since then they've focused on making them lighter and lighter, but it's not like the CRT was the majority of the weight.

[–] Tiger_Man_@szmer.info 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

they did emit x rays but most of them was blocked by the leaded glass

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Barium glass.

Leaded glass was only used for the rear of the tube (or amber monochrome displays), the front glass was barium infused for colour CRTs.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Radioactivity and X-Rays are tangentially related, but they're not at all the same thing.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I like this comment except for the fact it seems needlessly hostile