this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2026
320 points (98.5% liked)

politics

31196 readers
1531 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Former Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH), who is also the current Democratic Senate candidate for Ohio, found himself in hot water in a past campaign over his response to anti-trans attacks from Republicans, and now he appears to be taking a different approach. 

Instead of trying to defend or explain his views on trans rights, Brown released an ad last week slamming Republicans for focusing on trans people at all, when there are so many bigger challenges facing the state.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kingkong@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

its always the economy. and then corruption routing by the elites. Can we ALL PLEASE stop focusing anything on culture wars for the next elections until we get these dumpster fires out? focusing on your racism or special interest is what lead to the destruction of the nation and letting billionaires corrupt our nation as a whole and start wars steal wealth more fraud waste abuse by contractors being 75% of government and gas lighting us to firing 25% of gov workers to hire more contractors. STOP chasing your own special interests.

REMOVE INCOME TAX they DO NOT TAX THE WEALTHY EVER. at least for anyone making 100-200k = lower middle to upper middle pay the most not wealthy as percentage of wealth gained as gas lighting musk says. then you can tax the rest if you want but 90% of the nation should not be paying income tax at all with what the esptein class has pulled recent years bail outs after bailouts wars after wars started by themselves and producing pandemic killing millions for their gains.

its not even about parties both sides are the same but we need to keep them both in check. focus MUCH less about culture and much more about economy and corruption no one should give one rats ass about lgbtq or cultural rights that is not important. we focus on individual rights not any cultural group. economically though sorry but I will not tolerate concentration of wealth if you are protected by proposition 13 like in ca and other forms of welfare for the wealthy you are the problem. revoke as much of it as possible.

if they had paid regular prop taxes today as the new buyer would they would all go bankrupt. that is a fact. focus on crashing the housing market if you refuse focus on increasing min wage to match the housing market that would be a min wage of 200 dollars an hour now.

thats just a fact. choose to lower prices or raise wages. IDGAF about your culture wars and stop wasting money on bailing out other nations and remove the tariffs. do wealth tax if you can but LAND VALUE TAX is the easiest tax to put in place to replace the income tax.

[–] Polisheocket@lemmy.zip -1 points 3 days ago

I’m a fan of prop 13, keeps family homes in the family and allows elderly to enjoy their final years and not being thrown in a state run elder care facility. Which we don’t have enough to even take in all the elders that would lose their home. While i understand your point many elderly aren’t wealthy, their living on social security and small pension payments. Having a expensive house doesn’t do anything for you if you never sell it. Most are in dire need of repair as well which on,y someone with money could take on.