this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2026
321 points (96.0% liked)

Selfhosted

62233 readers
721 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I know that I can simply make my own private certificate authority that only I and my family trust. But is there some public provider like letsencrypt that is in a free-er part of the world than the US?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That the U.S. government can arbitrarily take down websites by revoking certificates issued by let's encrypt? How obvious can it be? I wondered the same thing as OP months ago. We need european alternatives. I think there are some, have some bookmarked somewhere.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Huh, FF on Android doesn't care.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Most browsers don't, hence my calling revocation a joke.

So many in this thread are up in arms about something the majority of browsers don't care about and have actively ignored for as long as I can recall

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I was just surprised bc the page explicitly lauds FF for checking revocation.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

It may only be the desktop version, most mobile browsers aren't as feature complete as their desktop counterparts.

But, given Google ripped revocation checking out of chromium, I wouldn't be surprised if they nerfed it in Android too...

[–] T4V0@lemmy.pt 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Orion browser (maybe safari?) on iOS detected the revoked certificate, and asked me to confirm before accessing the website while warning about the dangers.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Does regular safari show the same prompt? Afaik, browsers on iOS are safari reskins, so I'm curious if they added his cert in directly again, or if the onion browser actually follows standards the os browser doesn't.

[–] T4V0@lemmy.pt 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but safari doesn't even let me ignore the warning, it has a explanation in detail, and only allows closing the website.

[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You didn’t look hard enough. My router cert isn’t valid and I have to bypass the warning every time.

[–] T4V0@lemmy.pt 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Maybe there’s a special case for local subnets?

Here’s what shows up for me (in portuguese):

Safari browser invalid certificate warning page.

Clicking on more details, only allows me to check the certificate:

Safari browser detailed information for invalid certificate warning.

Here’s the translated details:

Safari warns you when a website has an invalid certificate. This can happen if an attacker has compromised your connection. For your protection, you cannot visit this site. You can check later to see if the problem has been solved. You can also contact the site owner to report this error.

To learn more, you can see the certificate.

Said certificate:

iOS invalid certificate information.

Edit: on the latest iOS version (27) btw.

[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

Thanks for the proof! I stand corrected! I see basically the same but after the view link there is another think that bypasses it.

Must be difference between expired vs compromised cert.

[–] DegradationDenial@feddit.nl 5 points 1 day ago

If the certificate only lasts two months revocation isn’t necessary, just deny recertification.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And what if you need to get a new certificate?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 day ago

Aren't we back at OP's question?