this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2026
51 points (98.1% liked)

Wild Feed

657 readers
154 users here now

A catch-all world journalism community for news, reports, blogs, editorials, and whatever.

Tag if needed:

[NSFW] and [Content Warning - x] — At your discretion.

[D/M/Y] — If the publication is older than a month. You can just tag the year if the article is more than a year old.

[Month and/or year] — For old but relevant articles. Use your best judgement.

[Conspiracy Tuesday] — Conspiracy theories/occult themes/cryptids/pseudoscience. On Tuesdays.

[E-mail required] — If an e-mail is needed to sign in.

[Archive link in post] — For paywalls and account sign-ins, link the main article in the URL, paste the archive link in the text body.

*Current means the article contains the most up to date publically available information on the subject, within reason. Older publications are welcome as long as they include a date tag.

*Good quality means the source has a good reputation for accurate journalism with a reasonably clean fact checking record.

Check out !Independent_Media@lemmy.today for independent news from around the world or !indy_news_canada@sh.itjust.works for Canadian independent publications.

All communities were created with the goal of increasing media literacy and media pluralism.

Sources posted here include:

https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/

https://www.apa.org/

apnews.com/

https://arstechnica.com/

https://www.theatlantic.com/

https://www.bbc.com/

https://www.earth.com/

https://www.theguardian.com/international

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/

https://lithub.com/

https://www.mentalfloss.com/

https://www.newscientist.com/

http://psychologytoday.com/

https://www.thequint.com/

https://www.reuters.com/

https://www.rfi.fr/en/

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/

https://time.com/

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/us

Icon image by z0r0z on pixabay, depicting a silhouette of a world map on a paint-splattered background.

Banner image by Lucentius on pixabay, depicting crumpled newpapers.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The lone holdout juror in the trial of Lindsay Clancy has said he "didn't have any doubts" that she was criminally responsible for killing her three children.

"Based on all the physical evidence, key witnesses and what the prosecution presents, I thought it was enough proof that she knew exactly what she was doing and planned it," Michael Desronvil said in a statement to CBS News, the BBC's US partner.

The judge declared a mistrial on 4 September after the jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict following nearly 40 hours of deliberating.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Anyone working to strip women of their rights based on this one case is doing so nefariously. This isn't a novel case, this isn't the first postpartum psychosis incident.

It's not Lindsey Clancy's fault if bad actors use her case to attack all women.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well, then I guess we agree that at the very least this guy whose name I can't be bothered to remember or even look up is probably a shitty person and should be treated with disgust by everyone who meets him (probably the best reason to learn his name), and that if it didn't happen in this case another would have come along that the people trying to remove rights could use as a foil to their means.

That suggests to me that focusing on this loser, or the choice he made that was entirely in his right, will be nothing more than a red herring and it would be better to focus on this case being used as an excuse to remove women's rights.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

it would be better to focus on this case being used as an excuse to remove women’s rights.

Yep, that's why I've posted about that very thing myself.

I also think that it is worthy to publicly push back on some of these sexist opinions that are rising from people conflating Lindsey Clancy with all women as if we are a monolith.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely fair. Hell, even Lemmy users are a pretty small, self-selected bunch and we aren't a monolith.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hey thanks for having a back and forth with me that didn't devolve into name calling or personal digs. That was nice :)

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well, I'm a real, multi-faceted person, and I have my bad days, but I try to call out behavior and statements and avoid insults. Sometimes it's easier, and this was certainly one of them. Maybe we can argue/discuss again in the future. :D

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Maybe we can argue/discuss again in the future.

I'd like that :)

[–] ageedizzle@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

women’s rights

What rights are at stake here? Women’s right to kill their toddlers?