Vintage and Retro Ads, Promos, Fliers, Etc.

1523 readers

1 users here now

For sharing images of vintage magazine ads, fliers, promos, etc.

We're going to play it pretty loose with timeframe here so please don't get offended anyone :)

Be nice. All instance rules apply.

Rules:

Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.

No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.

No Ads / Spamming.

No pornography.

Règles :

Soyez respectueux. Tout le monde doit se sentir le bienvenu ici.

Pas de bigoterie - y compris le racisme, le sexisme, le capacitisme, l’homophobie, la transphobie ou la xénophobie.

Pas de publicités / Pas de spam.

Pas de pornographie.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

can@sh.itjust.works

[META] Should we (continue to) allow retro/vintage ads for products that are still available? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by can@sh.itjust.works to c/vintageads@sh.itjust.works

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There has been concern that if an ad is for a product someone can still purchase today then it is more an ad, and less something retro/vintage.

Anyone have any thoughts either way? I may do a poll.

Edit: This appears pretty conclusive. There will be no changes at this time. Some have mentioned the lack of hard timeframe but until that becomes an obvious issue is prefer to keep it vague.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Vintage is 25+ years, antique is 100. That's the guidance of physical items typically. Seems to fit here as well, IMO.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

1999 is vintage. I'm not sure how to feel about that. It's around the turn of the century, which somehow feels both recent and distant.